Ceiba Accounting Services

Indiana's Cigarette Tax Sparks Modern Bootlegging

Indiana’s latest cigarette tax hike not only reflects fiscal policy but also echoes its historical roots in bootlegging culture. As the state increases the per-pack price, stringent penalties against smugglers come into effect, reminiscent of Prohibition-era crackdowns on illicit alcohol production.

The scenario mirrors the mid-1930s, when efforts were made to dismantle illegal beer and tobacco operations. Today’s targets have shifted from clandestine distilleries to interstate highways, where frugal smokers evade taxes by exploiting cheaper out-of-state prices.

Image 1

States like Kentucky and Tennessee serve as cautionary examples. With Kentucky’s cigarette tax at a mere 10 cents compared to Indiana’s new rate, it becomes a key export hub, creating smuggling corridors that reach multiple states. Similarly, Tennessee experienced a rise in cigarette trafficking at its borders following tax hikes in the 2000s, a modern version of the ‘beer flats’ but for tobacco.

Yet, the broader narrative is complex. A 2018 study by Johns Hopkins analyzed the outcomes of states like Indiana raising cigarette taxes significantly. Following a 2007 increase from 55¢ to 99.5¢ per pack, Indiana’s revenue soared by 43% within 12 months, indicating tax hikes can improve net revenue despite smuggling threats.

Indiana is revisiting past measures with a modern twist, campaigning against tobacco smuggling as it once did against alcohol bootlegging.

Rigorous Enforcement: New Legislative Measures

With the cigarette tax doubling from July 1, Indiana is also ramping up enforcement:

  • Bulk out-of-state purchases are criminalized, escalating major offenders to felony status.

  • Enhanced task forces—comprising Excise and state police—surveil shipments at toll booths and storage facilities.

  • Surprise audits target wholesalers and retailers to catch counterfeit tax stamps.

  • Projected revenue gain: $290 million annually, allocated to public health initiatives.

Image 2

Interstate Temptations and Enforcement Gaps

The challenge lies in enforcement, particularly given Indiana’s proximity to lower-tax states like Kentucky. The Tax Foundation ranks Indiana among the most vulnerable to cigarette smuggling increases post-tax hike, citing potential consumer evasion through border shopping.

Ohio’s lower tax and extensive highway network also demand vigilance. A 2024 Mackinac Center report forecasts that up to 12% of Indiana-smoked cigarettes may originate via cross-border purchases in the first year post-hike.

Strategic Lessons from Illinois and New York

Illinois:

  • Illinois’ recent tax increase— 45% on wholesale nicotine products—intensifies smuggling risk.
  • About 30% of consumed cigarettes are estimated to be illicitly transported.
  • Post-2019 tax increase enforcement led to stricter penalties and targeted large shipments.

New York:

  • Ranking high nationally for combined tobacco taxes, New York reports smuggling rates over 50%, spiking to 61% post-hike.
  • The state’s enforcement includes felony charges for trafficking in hundreds of cartons.

Reviving a Legacy of Hoosier Craftiness

Bootlegging runs deep in Indiana’s history. During Prohibition, the state was a hotbed for moonshiners, particularly in rural southern counties. Transport routes dubbed “Whiskey Roads” were notorious for their night-time smuggling activities.

Image 3

While the goods have changed from spirits to cigarettes, the strategies remain largely unchanged: exploiting legal loopholes and capitalizing on geographical advantages.

Former Excise officer John Halverson remarked, “It’s no longer barn-based stills, but car trunks full of cigarette cartons.”

Evaluating Public Health and Economic Implications

Not everyone views the potential rise in smuggling as a failure. Health advocates suggest that even with evasion, elevated prices deter smoking, impacting young and low-income smokers most effectively.

Mike Seilback of the American Lung Association stated in a Indiana Capital Chronicle, “Higher tobacco prices are crucial in reducing smoking rates. We anticipate substantial reductions in smoking initiation and prevalence.”

Research shows that despite 10-30% smuggling rates, states can achieve net revenue increases, provided enforcement is adequately strengthened. Indiana’s 2007 experience brings this into focus, where sales dropped 41% but revenue rose by 43%.

Will Indiana’s Strategy Deliver Results?

Indiana’s stakes are high, hinging on a delicate balance of deterrence and enforcement. Can regional businesses adjust? Will new-age smugglers get caught in time?

As the landscape evolves, only future analysis will reveal whether this reboot of past strategies will succeed. For now, the echoes of the 1930s resonate across the Midwest. The stakes remain; the players and methods may change, but the challenge of adapting to prohibition-esque policies continues.

Share this article...
Facebook
Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Pocket Reddit Email

Want tax & accounting tips and insights?

Sign up for our newsletter.

I confirm this is a service inquiry and not an advertising message or solicitation. By clicking “Submit”, I acknowledge and agree to the creation of an account and to the and .